<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new version of Windows Live Messenger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardshih.com/blog/2009/10/11/a-new-version-of-windows-live-messenger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardshih.com/blog/2009/10/11/a-new-version-of-windows-live-messenger/</link>
	<description>A new beginning as I enter the world of software engineering, while not forgetting my passions of photography, food, and travel.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:20:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Shih</title>
		<link>http://www.richardshih.com/blog/2009/10/11/a-new-version-of-windows-live-messenger/#comment-2314</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Shih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardshih.com/blog/?p=832#comment-2314</guid>
		<description>I suppose that&#039;s one reason to withhold a change log, but other companies and organizations release their bug fixes publicly all the time. I guess you have to consider the demographic and other factors - like how the users of WLM don&#039;t actively upgrade unless forced to (I know of a lot of people that put off downloading v14). My main issue with the upgrade process is that it&#039;s not simple - clicking download downloads and runs the downloader / installer for the suite and not just for WLM.

Things are going well. I haven&#039;t updated the About statement to reflect my current position, but glad you like it. Hope things are going swimmingly with the next version of Windows Live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose that&#8217;s one reason to withhold a change log, but other companies and organizations release their bug fixes publicly all the time. I guess you have to consider the demographic and other factors &#8211; like how the users of WLM don&#8217;t actively upgrade unless forced to (I know of a lot of people that put off downloading v14). My main issue with the upgrade process is that it&#8217;s not simple &#8211; clicking download downloads and runs the downloader / installer for the suite and not just for WLM.</p>
<p>Things are going well. I haven&#8217;t updated the About statement to reflect my current position, but glad you like it. Hope things are going swimmingly with the next version of Windows Live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Dolin</title>
		<link>http://www.richardshih.com/blog/2009/10/11/a-new-version-of-windows-live-messenger/#comment-2305</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Dolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardshih.com/blog/?p=832#comment-2305</guid>
		<description>... I hope all is well with you and I like your &quot;About&quot; statement :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; I hope all is well with you and I like your &#8220;About&#8221; statement <img src='http://www.richardshih.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Dolin</title>
		<link>http://www.richardshih.com/blog/2009/10/11/a-new-version-of-windows-live-messenger/#comment-2304</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Dolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardshih.com/blog/?p=832#comment-2304</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about this specific case, but I&#039;ve heard that when a patch is released and it&#039;s not a foced upgrade, to prevent accidental disclosure of the vulnerability, minimal information is shared.  

O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about this specific case, but I&#8217;ve heard that when a patch is released and it&#8217;s not a foced upgrade, to prevent accidental disclosure of the vulnerability, minimal information is shared.  </p>
<p>O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
